Draft Metrics: The Draft Pipeline
By: Tony Villiotti
December 11, 2010
As has been well established in earlier Draft Metrics articles, the draft is the principal entry point into the NFL for college players. In this article, Draft Metrics identified the source of NFL draftees over a 20-year period (from the
1991 draft through the 2010 draft). Please note that this article is focused only on players drafted, not the success of those draftees. That issue will be addressed in a future article.
Over 300 colleges had players drafted during the study period. For purposes of this analysis, those 300 colleges were divided into four categories: Colleges that are in BCS conferences whose winner automatically qualifies for the Bowl Championship Series (BCSAQ) which includes the ACC, the Big 10, the Big 12, the Big East, the PAC 10 and the SEC --- Colleges that are in the other Bowl Championship Series conferences (BCSO) including Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference and the Western Athletic Conference --- Colleges that are in conferences that are part of the Football Championship Series (FCS), formerly known as Division I-AA schools --- All other colleges.
This categorization was based on the 2010 conference membership of each college. Miami (FL), for example, is included in the ACC for the entire period even though it was a Big East member for part of the period.
Not surprisingly, Draft Metrics found that a solid majority of drafted players come from the BSCAQ conferences. The chart to the right summarizes this finding.
As shown in the following table, the results vary somewhat when the source of drafted players is analyzed by playing position.
    QB RB WR TE OL DL LB DB K ALL
Total   100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
BCSAQ   65.5% 77.2% 65.4% 70.6% 73.3% 75.1% 77.1% 72.7% 75.3% 72.9%
BCSO   20.7% 13.0% 17.7% 15.8% 15.1% 12.0% 13.2% 14.2% 16.9% 14.6%
FCS   8.5% 6.8% 10.1% 8.9% 7.6% 7.5% 6.1% 8.2% 5.6% 7.8%
Other   5.3% 3.0% 6.8% 4.7% 4.0% 5.4% 3.6% 4.9% 2.2% 4.7%
Analysis of BSCAQ Conferences
Draft Metrics next reviewed the performance of each of the BCSAQ conferences. Complete details are in the appendix to this article. Since the number of teams in the conferences varies from eight (Big East) to 12 (ACC, Big 12 and SEC), the following shows the average number of players drafted per team for each conference during the entire 20-year study period and for the last five years.
The Big East, of course, is the "poor cousin" in this analysis but its results were better in the last five years.
The differences among the conferences during the study period vary by playing position. Comments by playing position are as follows:
• Quarterbacks - PAC 10 was the top supplier of QBs with the Big 10 a distant second
• Running Backs - Big 10 and the SEC provided the most RBs
• Wide Receivers - The SEC was the clear leader followed by the Big 10 and PAC 10
• Tight Ends - The PAC 10 led the way, followed by the Big 10
• Offensive Line - Big 10 led by a fairly large margin, followed by the PAC 10
• Defensive Line - The SEC and the ACC were the dominant providers with the SEC having a fairly large lead
• Linebackers - The ACC is the leading provider, followed by Big 10 and the PAC 10
• Defensive Backs - PAC 10 and the ACC lead, followed closely by the SEC
Individual BCSAQ College Analysis
The BCSAQ Conferences include 65 schools, with three additional schools (Notre Dame, Army and Navy) included as independents. 10 schools provided almost 30% of all the players drafted from the 75 schools. The following table shows the top ten (eleven with ties where applicable) schools and the number of players drafted for the entire 20-year period and then in five-year increments.
1991-2010   2006-2010   2001-2005   1996-2000   1991-1995
Miami (FL) 117   USC 44   Miami (FL) 42   Tennessee 34   Miami (FL) 35
Tennessee 116   LSU 31   Ohio State 36   Florida State 31   Colorado 34
Ohio State 115   Ohio State 31   Georgia 32   Nebraska 30   Florida State 32
Florida State 114   Texas 28   Florida State 31   Florida 28   Penn State 32
USC 110   Florida 26   Tennessee 30   Ohio State 25   Nebraska 31
Florida 107   Georgia 26   Florida 28   Colorado 24   Tennessee 31
Nebraska 102   Virginia Tech 26   Wisconsin 26   Michigan 23   Washington 28
Penn State 94   Oklahoma 25   Nebraska 24   Arizona State 22   Texas A&M; 26
Michigan 91   Penn State 24   LSU 22   Penn State 22   USC 26
Georgia 90   Miami (FL) 22   Michigan 22   Texas A&M; 22   Florida 25
            Oklahoma 22         Michigan 25
Certain schools have developed a reputation for developing players at certain positions (e.g., Penn State referred to as "Linebacker U"). As shown in the appendix, Draft Metrics accumulated the players drafted by position at all BCSAQ colleges for the entire 20-year period to see if these perceptions are supported by reality.
Quarterbacks   Running Backs   Wide Receivers   Tight Ends
USC 9   Ohio State 15   Florida 21   Iowa 9
Oregon 7   Penn State 15   Florida State 19   Notre Dame 9
Michigan 7   Tennessee 14   Miami (FL) 19   Texas 8
Louisville 6   USC 12   Ohio State 18   Virginia 8
Ohio State 6         USC 17      
Tennessee 6         Tennessee 16      
Offensive Line   Defensive Line   Linebackers   Defensive Backs
Notre Dame 24   Florida State 25   Florida State 19   Nebraska 26
California 19   Florida 24   Nebraska 19   Ohio State 24
Michigan 19   Tennessee 23   Ohio State 19   Miami (FL) 21
Iowa 17   Georgia 21   Penn State 18   Virginia Tech 21
Nebraska 17   Miami (FL) 20   USC 17   Notre Dame 20
Penn State 17                  
Washington 17                  
BCSO and FCS Colleges
While far behind the BCSAQ conferences, the BSCO conferences also produce a significant number of draftees (about 38 per year during the 20-year period). Nine BCSO schools account for over 40% of those draftees. These schools (with the number of draftees in parentheses) are Brigham Young (40), Utah (40), Fresno State (39), San Diego State (37), Texas Christian (32), Southern Mississippi (30), Houston (27), East Carolina (25) and Hawaii (25).
FCS conferences produced about 20 draftees per year during the study period. The Draft Metrics analysis shows that eight schools are responsible for about a quarter of those draft choices. These schools are Jackson State (17), Grambling (14), Florida A&M; (13), Hampton (13), Northwestern State (12), Tennessee State (11), Eastern Kentucky (10) and Southern (10).
Post-Draft Performance
Please also refer to the "Draftees by College" data base for more information on how the draftees actually performed. That data base will be updated and another article published once the 2010 season is completed.
Players Drafted by Teams Playing in Conferences with Automatic BCS Qualification:
    Number Drafted By Position   By 5-Yr. Period
    QB RB WR TE OL DL LB DB K Total   06-10 01-05 96-00 91-95
Atlantic Coast Conference
Boston College   4 2 1 4 15 8 3 3 0 40   11 8 12 9
Clemson   1 4 6 0 8 14 16 15 1 65   19 10 16 20
Duke   1 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 7   0 1 6 0
Florida State   5 11 19 2 12 25 19 19 2 114   20 31 31 32
Georgia Tech   1 5 5 1 7 7 10 8 3 47   16 7 10 14
Maryland   1 2 2 5 6 8 7 8 1 40   13 13 7 7
Miami (FL)   5 11 19 10 14 20 16 21 1 117   22 42 18 35
North Carolina   0 6 8 5 6 19 12 12 0 68   10 17 21 20
North Carolina State   1 4 6 3 7 9 6 17 0 53   15 12 7 19
Virginia   4 10 5 8 11 10 7 8 1 64   15 14 19 16
Virginia Tech   3 7 8 3 14 11 7 21 1 75   26 21 17 11
Wake Forest   0 1 1 2 4 4 4 6 1 23   12 4 4 3
Total   26 63 80 43 108 136 107 139 11 713   179 180 168 186
Avg. Per School   2.17 5.25 6.67 3.58 9.00 11.33 8.92 11.58 0.92 59.42   14.92 15.00 14.00 15.50
Big Ten Conference
Illinois   1 5 4 2 11 4 6 9 1 43   8 12 8 15
Indiana   2 3 4 0 6 3 1 6 0 25   7 3 5 10
Iowa   1 7 4 9 17 8 5 12 1 64   18 19 13 14
Michigan   7 11 12 7 19 10 10 13 2 91   21 22 23 25
Michigan State   4 7 10 4 9 13 8 6 4 65   11 15 17 22
Minnesota   0 5 3 1 7 5 2 5 0 28   8 10 6 4
Northwestern   1 4 4 1 6 4 7 3 0 30   6 9 9 6
Ohio State   6 15 18 3 13 14 19 24 3 115   31 36 25 23
Penn State   3 15 9 7 17 11 18 12 2 94   24 16 22 32
Purdue   3 2 2 2 10 13 6 5 1 44   13 18 8 5
Wisconsin   2 7 8 6 16 11 9 9 1 69   16 26 14 13
Total   30 81 78 42 131 96 91 104 15 668   163 186 150 169
Avg. Per School   2.73 7.36 7.09 3.82 11.91 8.73 8.27 9.45 1.36 60.73   14.82 16.91 13.64 15.36
Big Twelve Conference
Baylor   0 1 3 0 5 8 2 7 1 27   6 3 8 10
Colorado   2 6 10 4 15 11 14 16 2 80   9 13 24 34
Iowa State   2 2 0 1 5 3 2 2 0 17   5 6 3 3
Kansas   0 3 4 1 7 5 3 5 0 28   7 5 8 8
Kansas State   3 4 9 3 6 5 7 11 1 49   8 19 15 7
Missouri   0 3 7 4 3 10 1 2 0 30   12 6 5 7
Nebraska   1 11 3 3 17 19 19 26 3 102   17 24 30 31
Oklahoma   2 8 7 7 13 15 15 15 0 82   25 22 17 18
Oklahoma State   1 3 4 3 3 4 3 6 0 27   8 7 6 6
Texas   3 5 7 8 13 18 7 16 0 77   28 16 13 20
Texas A&M;   3 9 8 4 15 14 8 14 1 76   10 18 22 26
Texas Tech   2 4 5 0 5 4 3 9 0 32   9 9 8 6
Total   19 59 67 38 107 116 84 129 8 627   144 148 159 176
Avg. Per School   1.58 4.92 5.58 3.17 8.92 9.67 7.00 10.75 0.67 52.25   12.00 12.33 13.25 14.67
Big East Conference
Cincinnati   0 0 4 2 2 5 5 12 1 31   12 8 8 3
Connecticut   2 2 1 0 2 0 3 3 0 13   9 2 0 2
Louisville   6 5 4 2 6 9 4 8 1 45   16 12 8 9
Pittsburgh   1 6 5 3 8 4 7 10 2 46   14 14 4 14
Rutgers   2 3 3 3 4 2 1 4 0 22   13 4 2 3
South Florida   0 0 2 0 1 3 3 6 1 16   9 7 0 0
Syracuse   1 5 8 2 8 8 6 6 1 45   10 12 13 0
West Virginia   2 6 4 2 5 5 5 8 2 39   8 6 17 8
Total   14 27 31 14 36 36 34 57 8 257   91 65 52 49
Avg. Per School   1.75 3.38 3.88 1.75 4.50 4.50 4.25 7.13 1.00 32.13   11.38 8.13 6.50 6.13
Pac-10 Conference
Arizona   0 5 4 5 9 7 9 9 2 50   13 5 16 16
Arizona State   3 9 5 3 15 14 10 14 0 73   15 15 22 21
California   5 8 7 4 19 12 5 11 3 74   19 15 20 20
Oregon   7 6 6 6 5 9 2 15 1 57   19 16 13 9
Oregon State   2 1 5 1 6 6 7 7 0 35   14 15 4 2
Stanford   4 6 6 5 11 8 8 11 0 59   10 21 12 16
UCLA   2 7 9 6 6 5 8 16 1 60   10 17 11 22
USC   9 12 17 7 14 16 17 16 2 110   44 19 21 26
Washington   5 6 6 7 17 6 13 7 0 67   5 14 20 28
Washington State   3 1 6 1 3 6 4 12 1 37   5 11 10 11
Total   40 61 71 45 105 89 83 118 10 622   154 148 149 171
Avg. Per School   4.00 6.10 7.10 4.50 10.50 8.90 8.30 11.80 1.00 62.20   15.40 14.80 14.90 17.10
Southeastern Conference
Alabama   2 10 6 4 9 19 11 17 1 79   19 20 16 24
Arkansas   0 5 5 0 9 10 5 7 0 41   13 12 12 4
Auburn   1 11 7 1 15 15 6 10 0 66   19 15 14 18
Florida   4 6 21 5 13 24 15 18 1 107   26 28 28 25
Georgia   5 11 6 4 12 21 14 14 3 90   26 32 20 12
Kentucky   2 4 6 3 2 6 4 6 1 34   8 8 8 10
Louisiana State   5 9 13 5 10 18 2 12 2 76   31 22 14 9
Mississippi   1 5 3 2 12 8 5 7 0 43   11 12 7 13
Mississippi State   0 7 4 3 8 12 6 4 0 44   4 10 15 15
South Carolina   0 5 6 1 7 6 6 13 1 45   14 14 8 9
Tennessee   6 14 16 3 16 23 16 19 3 116   21 30 34 31
Vanderbilt   1 0 2 0 3 2 6 5 1 20   7 7 5 1
Total   27 87 95 31 116 164 96 132 13 761   199 210 181 171
Avg. Per School   2.25 7.25 7.92 2.58 9.67 13.67 8.00 11.00 1.08 63.42   16.58 17.50 15.08 14.25
Independents
Army   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2   1 0 1 0
Navy   0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3   0 0 0 3
Notre Dame   4 9 11 9 24 12 14 20 2 105   19 26 18 42
Total   5 9 11 10 25 13 14 21 2 110   20 26 19 45
 
BCSAQ   161 387 433 223 628 650 509 700 67 3758   950 963 878 967
BCSO   51 65 50 117 129 104 87 137 15 755   199 201 180 175
FCS   21 34 28 67 65 65 40 79 5 404   85 77 115 127
Other   13 15 15 45 34 47 24 47 2 242   39 40 67 96
Total   246 501 526 452 856 866 660 963 89 5159   1273 1281 1240 1365
Note: This article was originally published on Tony Villiotti's website, DraftMetrics.com and is being reprinted here with the permission of the author. Draft Metrics was established in 2010 but its roots were planted long before. Villiotti's obsession with the NFL Draft began in 1969. Over the years, his interest shifted from predicting draft choices to trying to better understand the draft's importance by examining its eventual outcomes.
Venedik�in meşhur saraylarını İstanbul�a getiren Viaport, Venezia projesinde 329 bin TL�den başlayan fiyatlarla satışa sunulan saray dairelerine yoğun ilgi yaşanıyor. Saray ihtişamını tüm ayrıntılarıyla içerisinde barındıracak olan daireler İstanbul�un en şık İtalyanı olacak� kakade Venedik�i İstanbul�a taşıyan Viaport Venezia, meşhur Venedik saraylarını da projeye koymayı unutmadı. 1+1�den 3+1 dublekslere kadar değişik seçeneklerde tasarlanan dairelerde oturacak olan proje sakinleri saray ihtişamını her ayrıntısıyla yaşayacak. Ekonomik değer olarak Türkiye�nin en büyük ilk 5 gayrimenkul yatırımından biri olan Viaport Venezia, Via Properties & Gürsoy Yatırım Ortaklığı güvencesiyle hayata geçiriliyor. Satışa çıktığı günden bu yana ilk etapta yüzde 85�inin satıldığı projede lanse edilen Venedik Sarayları etabında ise iki gün içerisinde yüzde 20�lik birporno ön talep toplandı. �İstanbul�un en şık İtalyanı� olarak Mayıs 2015�te boy gösterecek olan Venezia projesi, Venedik rüyasını gerçeğe dönüştürmeye gün sayıyor. Projede oturacak olan daire sakinleri, Venedik�in meşhur kakade kanallarında gondollarla gezebilecek, Venedik meydanlarında alışveriş yapabilecek, dostlarını Venedik restoranlarında ağırlayabilecek. Yüksek prim yapması öngörülen projedeki daireleri bugün satın alanların, proje porno bitiminde yüzde 50�lik bir prim kazancı elde etmeleri hedefleniyor.